Rolling Your Own Hashmap (performance)ΒΆ

date:2005-10-25 14:19:25
category:Culture of Complexity

Reference:

Minimum Object Count Map, part 9 (Performance)

[snip]

Minimum Object Count Map, part 9 (Performance)

I am not trying to attack/bash HashMap or suggest that MocMap is the new miracle implementation that should replace all other maps. I am trying to obtain an objective comparison to see where each one fits.[snip]

Minimum Object Count Map, part 9 (Performance)

Previous Opinion [link ]

And yet, the comparison does not mention TreeMap. I wonder how the already-available TreeMap compares with all of this effort. The quality is undeniable, but is there real value in this?

Previous topic

Why Is OO So Popular?

Next topic

Office 12 Interface

This Page