| date: | 2005-10-04 10:22:53 |
|---|---|
| category: | Culture of Complexity |
Reference:
Minimum Object Count Map, part 2 (Analysis)
[snip]
Minimum Object Count Map, part 2 (Analysis)
Was this really necessary? Yeah, it could be an overkill. [snip]
Minimum Object Count Map, part 2 (Analysis)
I think it was overkill in the worst way. I don’t see the head-to-head comparison with HashTree, which already minimizes storage. Since storage was the only problem, HashTree appears to be the solution. If performance was also a problem, then perhaps this might be worth the effort.
I’ll need to see the results of actual performance testing before I can agree that this was a worthwhile exercise.